The typo in the cover (a missing s) and the bottom line of text being cut in half on the title page did not bode well for this.

By the third paragraph I had encountered fragmentary sentences, bad grammar, and no identifiable typos. Then I turned the page and saw the (lack of) formatting on the Table of Contents.

I do wish people writing religious tracts would put more effort into how they present them. If your arguments can’t be understood, they won’t win people to your faith.

I quit at the end of the first chapter, where a portion of the author’s introduction is repeated wholesale, grammar errors and all. The Chapter header breaks across lines in the middle of a word. It is also painfully apparent that the author had no editor, proof-reader or even spell checker involved in this book.

The arguments are limited, and a primary school education answers most of them (e.g. how is the sun held in place without ropes, how does electricity get into a storm without cables?). I will not go further, as I risk commenting on the author, not the book, but Google or wikipedia will answer the author’s “unanswerable questions”.

Monks used to spend years transcribing books and pages to make sure the words were perfect. Can’t modern preachers at least use MS or Open Office spelling and grammar check?